In 1969, Buzz
Aldrin and Neil Armstrong landed on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission. Or
did they? A little known fact about the moon is the atmosphere is so thin that
air is not dense enough to ever produce a gust of wind. But watch the moon
landing video. Notice anything strange? The American flag is waving in the “wind”.
NASA also hid from us a room with reports that camera men and actors had been
moving in and out of late at night. Why would they do that to us? Was the
government involved just to scare the Soviet Union? Could a corporation as
large as NASA really pull off a stunt this large? Sure it is possible, but did
it really happen?
To pull off a
stunt of this magnitude would have taken hundreds of people, all of who could
keep a perfect secret. But wait, would the entire NASA program have to know?
All of the ‘information’ could be fed to them as if it was real. Fake problems
could arise, real human vitals could be used, a real rocket could be launched,
just not travel all the way to the moon, and a fake moon surface could be
reproduced with very little effort. All they needed was a credible person for
the American people to fall in love with, idolize, and believe.
That man was
Neil Armstrong. To the naked eye he was a veteran naval aviator with four years
of service. He flew over 75 combat missions in one of America’s bloodiest
wars—the Korean War (NASA). At that time, psychological issues due to post
traumatic events in wars were greatly unknown to the public; later these issues
were observed and much research was done on it. The results of those findings
showed that only 5% of soldiers suffered from PTSD (post traumatic stress
disorder) as a result of the Korean War. But, one thing is different about Neil
than the average Korean pilot. The average Pilot only flew in 25-30 combat
missions; Neil flew in 75. That data points to an 85% increase in PTSD,
something that will aid in Neil Armstrong’s mental instability (PTSD in
Military Veterans).
So with the data
suggesting that 90% of people who have been in Neil’s position have a
significant issue with PTSD and mental instability, does that raise any red
flags to you? We are going to send a man with a 90% chance of being mentally
unstable to be the first man to walk on the moon?
“No, any human
with the least bit of intelligence would not do that,” says one expert on space
exploration. (Fox) Many people believe that he was not sent to the moon, but
instead a film crew made it seem like he was and he believed it. According to
multiple sources Armstrong being in the mental state he could have been in
would have been easy to trick into anything. It is very possible he never left
planet earth, but believed 100% he stepped on the moon. That explains why his
interviews were so realistic; He truly believed he went to the moon. Now maybe
he really did go to the moon, but he is an excellent subject to be faked.
So, maybe you
believe Neil was in the 10% that did not suffer from PTSD and his mind was 100%
clear. Maybe you believe that it was impossible that NASA took advantage of
Neil and he was never part of it, but Neil’s psychological problems aren't the
only piece on the board that was played.
Have you ever
seen a picture of the lunar module landing sight? Check out photo 1. At first
glance, nothing seems to be out of place. There’s a large box with foil on it
that to the normal human looks kinda strange. That thing flew through space!
But then think about it, that spacecraft was
falling very fast. Now, in the
pictures, it looks like the spacecraft landed ever so gently on the surface of
the moon. That’s good actually, because an object plummeting towards the ground
is never a good thing. So, NASA had to design something to slow down the
spacecraft so nothing was damaged during the landing. Maybe a parachute slowed
it down, a technique often used here on earth. But, that really would not have
worked since the atmosphere is so thin on the moon’s surface. And NASA has
publicly said that they did not use a parachute, instead they used a rocket
booster to slow their decent. Fantastic idea, right? Well, yes… but have you
watched a shuttle launch recently? There is a lot of thrust power coming out of
those rockets. Now, go back to the moon landing pictures. All of that thrust
from the rocket would have moved a lot of the sandy surface of the moon away
from the landing site. But wait, the surface looks as if it hasn't been
bothered in thousands of years. So, NASA claims that over 10,000 pounds of
force from the rockets didn't disturb the ground at all (Tate).
That is not the
only strange thing going on in with pictures from the landing. Make it easy on
yourself, take the same picture you examined for the lack of an impact crater
and check out the light source, or should I say light sources. Not a big
deal right? On earth, there is almost always more than one light source at
night. You have the moon, light posts, a car’s headlights, and maybe even light
from your phone. The peculiar thing about the moon pictures is there weren't
any light posts, or car headlights, and especially no lights coming from a cell
phone. This is 1969! No one had an iPhone in those days! So, what is producing
the extra light? Vegas might be bright at night but I don't think its light
radiates all the way to the moon… So, NASA has come up with a defense theory
stating that the rough terrain managed to “warp” the light. That sounds more
like a star trek event than a real life story. On earth, light isn't “warped”
around a hill, so why would it do that on the moon? The more likely events that
transpired would be that NASA staged these photos here on earth and the
multiple light sources were from lights which were used in the stage.
You don't
believe that theory either? Well, examine photo 2. Once again, more evidence is
left that all the photos from the moon landing were taken here on earth. Notice
the small blur in the astronaut’s helmet? Maybe it was just a bird flying by,
but wait. There are no birds on the moon. As a matter of fact, there are, as we
know, no life on the moon. With that information, ask yourself what is that
black blur floating in space. Something could be hanging from a building or
post if this was taken on earth, but being taken on the moon there are no
structures built for something to be hung from in the air. This picture makes
it real simple. These photos were taken on earth. Picture 2 shows you what the
blur actually is. It is a light. This theory backs up all of the other theories
previously stated. This would explain why there are multiple light sources. It
would also explain why there was no blast crater, because there was no blast.
The final piece
of evidence I will bring up is not really a theory, but an actual truth. At the
time of this proposed moon landing, the U.S. and Russia were butting heads
constantly with each other. They were in the middle of the space race and The
United States refused to lose (Panin). President Kennedy had made a promise in
1961 to make it to the moon by the end of the decade. Now, the world would not
have ended if they had failed, and President Kennedy’s promise was broken.
Although there was not much to lose, there was much to gain. Most Americans
have pride in their country. This pride is more than the average human. We want
our country to be the best one with no one, especially Russia at that time, to
be better than us. Getting to the moon before the Russians was not just for
fun. It meant more to Americans. It was a sense of pride that we did something
they could not do. We were better than them. So, maybe the government had
something to do with this “moon landing.” Happy citizens are good citizens.
This is something that has been done in the past. Governments have lied to its
people to build their confidence in the country. Not only does it improve the
moral of its own people, but other nations will respect the country more
because it has done something no other country has the ability to do.
So, was the moon
landing really a fake? There sure is a lot of compiling evidence suggesting
that it was: The flag that waved in the wind— there is no wind on the surface
of the moon. Neil Armstrong— There is a 90% chance that he is mentally
unstable. There is no crater under the lunar module— But supposedly a rocket
booster slowed the decent. The floating blur in space— That can’t be a bird…
Unfortunately,
for all of the conspiracy theorists out there, the moon landing was real. Even
I was doubtful while doing research, but everything the theorists have come up
with have explanations. The flag waved because the astronaut bumped the pole
which caused the whole thing to vibrate. Neil Armstrong was part of the 10% who
weren't mentally unstable. You can ask anyone who he spoke with and they will
tell you that there is nothing wrong with the man or his brain. The lack or an
impact crater? Well, that can be explained by telling you that NASA chose an
area on the moon where the ground was solid, with no sandy surfaces. They
didn't want any of that sand messing up the landing. The blur in the picture
could be one of many things. First off, this picture was taken in 1969. There
were no 20 megapixel cameras. There also could have been a smudge on the camera
or on his helmet. And lastly, the hardest to explain, is the multiple light
sources. Due to the lack of an atmosphere and the material of the ground on the
moon, the hills actually do have the ability to bend light. They acted as a
very dirty mirror or piece of metal. The light, basically, reflected off of the
hills and bounced around in the craters to make those “multiple light sources.”
Sorry conspiracy theorists, you've worked hard, but all your work has just been
debunked.
Works Cited
Dunbar,
Brian. "Who Was Neil Armstrong?" NASA. NASA, 12 Aug. 2012.
Web. 8 Dec. 2015. <http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/who-was-neil-armstrong-k4.html>.
"PTSD
in Military Veterans." : Symptoms, Treatment, and the Road to Recovery
for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Web. 8 Dec. 2015.
<http://www.helpguide.org/articles/ptsd-trauma/ptsd-in-veterans.htm>.
No comments:
Post a Comment