The government has control over most
things in America. It regulates almost everything in order to make sure its
citizens are safe and properly supported. But what if they are attempting to
control too much? Unbeknownst to most, the US government has been trying their
hand at internet surveillance since as early as 1998, and it appears as if they
have not stopped (Staff). From internet history tracking, to FBI agents monitoring
your every move, where should the line be drawn? The government may have access
to all civilian computer files, smart gadget cameras, and even home security
systems with the people being none the wiser. The NSA (National Security
Association) is said to have access to the members of Congress’ personal
information, so what is stopping them from tapping the average citizen’s laptop
or smartphone (“Conspiracy...”)? The FBI may be monitoring every place you go,
question you type into a search engine, or every move you make, right under
your nose.
The
U.S. government is sometimes accused of partaking in the underhanded. Sometimes
the men and women that voters put into positions of power are not always who
they claim to be and do not have the peoples’ best interests at heart. This is
the reality of almost any government organization and most of the world is
forced to deal with this fact. For decades, the inhabitants of America have had
to endure the consequences of many political mistakes made by misguided
presidents, selfish representatives, and biased judges. With each passing
election, the layers of the republican foundation are being peeled back to
reveal the underlying corruption and struggle for power that is taking place in
Washington D.C. Although the government can seem like an unforgiving force that
does not care about the individual needs or desires of the people, it looks as
if they might care more than one would think. For years, with the United
States’ constant innovations in commerce, economics, and technology, there have
been major changes to the scale of which the national government is involved in
a normal citizen’s life.
The
FBI, NSA, and CIA are all in charge of the safety, domestic surveillance, and
international surveillance of the United States of America (“What is the
FBI?”). They conduct investigations appointed specifically to them, while also
having the power to weigh in on any case in any jurisdiction of the country
(1). Along with this, foreign affairs and threats also fall under their area of
expertise (2). All three branches of national security are involved in highly
classified intelligence operations and have more recently chosen to share even
less about their affairs with the public (3).
With this much authority, it is not too far-fetched to assume that they
are overly involved in the lives of the country’s citizens as well. Each
organization has its own form of unethical “spying”, but the government as a
whole is to be blamed for this atrocious act.
Unfortunately, the secret
gathering of private information is not a new development. The NSA first
introduced the concept of mass data collection under the presidency of George
W. Bush (“How”…). In the midst of the 9/11 tragedy, President Bush issued a
top-secret surveillance program, now known as the “Terrorist Surveillance
Program,” to intercept any communications between around five to ten thousand
suspicious U.S. citizens and Al Qaeda (1). The details of this were kept
extremely private until incriminating evidence started being released by
unnamed government employees (2). Although the government later reassured the
nation’s people that it was all done under the guise of national security, the
privacy of millions of unknowing citizens had been violated (3). With this
incident, the government’s surveillance of the private lives of Americans
officially began.
Since
then, the NSA has implemented even more “foreign information collection”
programs that incidentally drag almost every American with an electronic device
into the crossfire (Adler-Bell et al). The official function of these programs
is to target any communication involving the subject of their choice (1). This
means that any mention of said subject made by an unsuspecting citizen, whether
deliberate or accidental, will be obtained by national security to use for
whatever they wish (2). These programs, formally known as PRISM and Upstream,
give the government even more control over everyday life than they already
possess (3). The NSA has been recently accused of having used this
technological advantage to tap into the information shared and intercepted by
major companies such as YouTube, Google, and Apple, and many more (4). This
could only mean that with all of the data gathered from those service
providers, goes the records of the customers as well (5). The concern from the
people did not go unheard, as several lawsuits followed the implementation of
these programs (6). This is what provided the citizens with the 2015 USA
Freedom Act, which was intended to put an end to all outright data mining done
by the NSA (7). Although it did diminish any overt collection of information,
there is still much unrestricted territory the government has taken advantage
of without public knowledge (8). Without the eyes of the nation upon them, they
are allowed even more room for deceit and invasiveness. Even government
officials have become suspicious of their electronics but refuse to admit why.
For example, the former director of the FBI, James Comey, was constantly
berated with questions about why he kept all of the cameras on his personal
devices covered, to which he responded, “It’s not crazy that the FBI
director cares about personal security as well, so I think people ought to take
responsibility for their own safety and security” (Hattem). This response seems
to be an attempt to divert the attention away from the real question at hand:
Has the government lost its seemingly unrelenting grip over its own
organizations? With each security scandal that makes its way to the press, it
seems as if this might be the case.
In the end, the government holds the upper hand when it comes
to unauthorized data collection. Not only do they have infinite resources at
their disposal, but they also have secrecy on their side. It is much easier for
the people in power to hide their corrupt behavior, despite almost constant
public scrutiny. The issue with this is clear, as the people should not have to
sit back and watch as the government takes over their lives one tapped camera
at a time. The support of the unauthorized surveillance theory has grown in
passing years. According to a survey done about America’s distrust in its
leadership in 2003, only one-third of all the respondents considered themselves
to be “government skeptics” (An Abiding Suspicion…). When the survey was redone
in 2015, the proportion had increased to 49% (1). The national security
branches continuously try to stamp this suspicion out with rushed privacy
propositions and empty promises. At what lengths will they go to put an end to
this spreading wildfire of doubt in the national government?
There
are a number of ways that the FBI could be tracking your every move, but only a
few have solid evidence behind them. Vehicle tracking is one of these few.
Almost everyone knows that the government has technology for tracking run-away
felons, suspicious characters, or those trying to escape the country, but it
seems they might have decided to use those devices on the general public,
instead. This concern has never been very prevalent or talked about amongst
American media until a recent incident concerning Arab-American college
student, Yasir Afifi, came to light (Zetter). After finding a secret GPS
tracking device attached to his car, Afifi immediately took to the internet in
his confusion (1). Initially he was not sure of the actual owner or purpose of
this device, but his curiosity quickly dissipated when FBI agents and police
officers arrived at his doorstep and ordered him return it to them (1). The
agents became forceful with him when he questioned their visit, saying, “We’re going to make this much more
difficult for you if you don’t cooperate” (1).
The U.S.-born student complied but also mentioned that he had
done nothing to warrant government surveillance (1). Naturally, speculation
around the reason for the unauthorized tracking arose, the most popular guess
being that Yasir Afifi was being investigated for terrorism (1). The situation
died out fairly quickly though, as it was never formally acknowledged by the
FBI (1). The second conspiracy around government surveillance involves the
monitoring of something more personal: internet search history. This issue was
also fairly small until the integration of the ‘PRISM’ program in 2013
(Strickland and Kiger). The program was kept under wraps by the NSA until a
former employee of the organization, Edward Snowden, revealed the true extent
of the government’s surveilling power (1). He went to the press with
information about ‘PRISM’, the program made to intercept online communications
(2). When asked about his reasoning for blowing the whistle on these secret
operations despite facing severe consequences, he replied, “I'm willing to sacrifice all of that
because I can't in good conscience allow the US government to destroy privacy,
internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this
massive surveillance machine they're secretly building” (Greenwald). Snowden
went on to release several top-secret materials about ‘PRISM’, including the
extensive reach of its oversight (1). This program gives the NSA direct
access to numerous influential internet service providers, and by extension,
the information of their costumers (Strickland and Kiger). Further
investigation into the reaches of this program also revealed a secret
collection of over 180 million records from communication links between data
centers done by the government (1). Although it is technically legal for the
government to obtain information shared internationally, civilian information
is caught in the crossfire (2). Most government organizations, such as the FBI,
NSA, and CIA, collect and monitor internet search history under the guise of
investigating suspicious activity, but the public can never know for sure
(3).
The final and possibly
most controversial theory is the alleged web camera tapping done by the FBI and
NSA. Along with the information about the ‘PRISM’ program, Edward Snowden also
revealed the existence of another NSA program called ‘Optic Nerves’ (Curran).
This operation collected all webcam images taken every five minutes from the
video chats of Yahoo users (1). The NSA had the ability to store these for
later use or use them for any other purpose that they wanted (2). On many other occasions, the FBI has also
been suspected of phone and laptop camera surveillance. James Atkins, a
government consultant specializes in surveillance, released a statement on the
rumors of FBI device tapping: "They can be
remotely accessed and made to transmit room audio all the time," he said,
"You can do that without having physical access to the phone” (McCullagh).
It has also been revealed that the government organization has found
ways to discreetly tap into a computer’s camera without turning on the user’s
camera light that indicates recording (“Should You...”). Though this method is
usually used in terrorism cases or other major criminal investigations, it is
still very unsettling to the average citizen to know that the government wields
that kind of power (1). Along with the access to major internet service
providers, the NSA can also tap into the apps that they provide (“Are
Your...”). When a phone user allows an application to access their camera,
photos, live-streams, and uploading function, that is basically giving them the
ability to do this at any time, even when the app is not being utilized (1).
This indirectly provides the government with a door right into the private
lives of the American public.
These three conspiracy
theories pose a convincing argument against the government in cases of
unauthorized surveillance. With actual proof of government organizations
tracking vehicles with no warning given to the citizen, this is just
confirmation of the undercover monitoring that the government partakes in. In
fact, 81% of those polled on Instagram agree with this theory. Along with this,
there is condemning evidence coming straight from former government officials
regarding internet search and web camera tracking. It seems that many Internet
users agree with this conspiracy as well. 98% of those polled on Instagram
believe that the government can monitor their search history, and 77% believe
that their webcams can be or have been tapped. These survey numbers indicate a
rise in support of the conspiracy on whether or not the U.S. government can
access information without the knowledge of its citizens.
The
government has been suspected on several occasions of tracking the cars,
internet histories, and web cameras of millions of American citizens. It seems
that the more technologically advanced the country becomes, the less privacy the
general public has. All three conspiracies made in favor of government
surveillance have been proven true in the years since 1998, the supposed
beginning of government agency spying (Staff). The FBI vehicle tracking theory,
though fairly sparse in evidence, is still a very relevant concern amongst
individuals in the United States. The second theory, internet search history
tracking, has also been revealed as a common practice in government
institutions, specifically the FBI, CIA, and the NSA. As for government webcam
tapping, all owners of electronic devices should use caution while downloading
applications and using their cameras, as you will never know who may be
watching. All the slowly building evidence against the government in the case
of this electronic surveillance epidemic provides a need for concern in the
general public of America.
Works Cited
Adler-Bell, Sam, et al. “10 Reasons You Should Still Worry About
NSA
Surveillance.” The
Century Foundation, 16 Mar. 2017,
https://tcf.org/content/facts/10-reasons-still-worry-nsa-surveillance/?agreed=1.
“Are Your
Laptop, Phone Camera and Microphone Spying on You?” South China Morning Post,
10 Apr. 2018, https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/article/2140934/are-your-laptop-phone-
camera-and-microphone-spying-you-why-you-should.
Conspiracy Theories and the NSA.
(n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/09/conspiracy_theo_1.html
Curran, Dylan. “Are Your Phone Camera and Microphone
Spying on You? | Dylan Curran.”
The Guardian,
Guardian News and Media, 6 Apr. 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/06/phone-camera-microphone-spying.
Greenwald, Glenn, et al. “Edward Snowden: The
Whistleblower behind the NSA Surveillance
Revelations.” The Guardian,
Guardian News and Media, 11 June 2013,
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-
surveillance.
Hattem, Julian. “FBI Director: Cover up Your
Webcam.” The Hill, 15 Sept. 2016,
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/295933-fbi-director-cover-up-your-webcam.
“How the NSA's Domestic Spying Program
Works.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, 10 Aug.
2014,
https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/how-it-works.
McCullagh, Declan. “FBI Taps Cell Phone Mic as
Eavesdropping Tool.” CNET, CNET, 4 Dec.
2006, https://www.cnet.com/news/fbi-taps-cell-phone-mic-as-eavesdropping-tool/.
“Should You
Cover Your Phone Camera? Here's What Security Experts Want You To
Know.” Bustle,
what-security-experts-want-you-to-know-8121712.
what-security-experts-want-you-to-know-8121712.
Staff, W. (2016, May 15). Everything We Know About
How the FBI Hacks People. Retrieved
Strickland, Jonathan, and Kiger, Patrick J. “Can the Government See
Which Websites I
Visit?” HowStuffWorks, HowStuffWorks, 6 May 2019,
https://computer.howstuffworks.com/government-see-website.htm
Staff, W. (2016, May 15). Everything We Know About
How the FBI Hacks People. Retrieved
The Washington Times. “An Abiding Suspicion of
Government.” The Washington Times,
The
Washington Times, 22 Sept. 2015, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/22/editorial-americans-suspicious-of-government/.
“What Is the FBI?” FBI, FBI, 7
May 2016, https://www.fbi.gov/about/faqs/what-is-the-fbi.
Zetter, Kim. “Caught Spying on Student, FBI Demands
GPS Tracker Back.” Wired, Conde Nast,
4 June 2017,
https://www.wired.com/2010/10/fbi-tracking-device/.
No comments:
Post a Comment